Skip Links
U.S. Department of State
Daily Press Briefing | What's NewU.S. Department of State
U.S. Department of State
SEARCHU.S. Department of State
Subject IndexBookmark and Share
U.S. Department of State
HomeHot Topics, press releases, publications, info for journalists, and morepassports, visas, hotline, business support, trade, and morecountry names, regions, embassies, and morestudy abroad, Fulbright, students, teachers, history, and moreforeign service, civil servants, interns, exammission, contact us, the Secretary, org chart, biographies, and more
Video
 You are in: Bureaus/Offices Reporting Directly to the Secretary > Office of the Legal Adviser > International Claims and Investment Disputes (L/CID) > NAFTA Investor-State Arbitrations > Cases Filed Against the United Mexican States  
Office of the Legal Adviser
International Claims and Investment Disputes (L/CID)
NAFTA Investor-State Arbitrations
Cases Filed Against the United Mexican States
Metalclad Corp. v. United Mexican States
  

Metalclad Corp. v. United Mexican States

The Metalclad Corporation, a U.S. waste disposal company, instituted arbitration proceedings against Mexico under the ICSID Additional Facility Rules. Metalclad alleged breaches of NAFTA Articles 1102, 1103, 1104, 1105, 1106(1)(f), 1110 and 1111. Its notice of arbitration asserted that Mexico wrongfully refused to permit Metalclad's subsidiary to open and operate a hazardous waste facility that Metalclad had built in La Pedrera, San Luis Potosi, despite the fact that the project was allegedly built in response to the invitation of certain Mexican officials and allegedly met all Mexican legal requirements. The notice sought damages of US$43,125,000 "plus damages for the value of the enterprise taken."

Hearings on the merits were held from late August through early September 1999. On August 30, 2000, the Metalclad tribunal issued an award in favor of the investor in the amount of $16.7 million. Mexico petitioned the Supreme Court of British Columbia to set aside the award on the grounds that the Metalclad tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction and that enforcing the award would violate public policy.  The British Columbia court set aside the award in part.

For further information and documents concerning this claim, click here.

--  U.S. 1128 Submission  [61 Kb]

  
U.S. Department of State
USA.govU.S. Department of StateWhat's New  |   Frequent Questions  |   Contact Us  |   Email this Page  |   Subject Index  |   Search
The Office of Electronic Information, Bureau of Public Affairs, manages this site as a portal for information from the U.S. State Department. External links to other Internet sites should not be construed as an endorsement of the views or privacy policies contained therein.
About state.gov  |   Privacy Notice  |   FOIA  |   Copyright Information  |   Other U.S. Government Information